Geheugen van de VU cookies

Voor optimale prestaties van de website gebruiken wij cookies. Overeenstemmig met de EU GDPR kunt u kiezen welke cookies u wilt toestaan.

Noodzakelijke en wettelijk toegestane cookies

Noodzakelijke en wettelijk toegestane cookies zijn verplicht om de basisfunctionaliteit van Geheugen van de VU te kunnen gebruiken.

Optionele cookies

Onderstaande cookies zijn optioneel, maar verbeteren uw ervaring van Geheugen van de VU.

Bekijk het origineel

Encyclopedia of sacred theology - pagina 254

Bekijk het origineel

+ Meer informatie

Encyclopedia of sacred theology - pagina 254

its principles ...

1 minuut leestijd

230 he writes

p. 379",

no poets TToXeo)?),

which

in

THE NAME

§ 56.

:

"

[Div. Ill

We, O Adimantos,

are at this

moment

but speak as founders of a city (ot/cicrrat and as such we should understand the forms (rviroi,} (TTOiT^rat ),

tlie

poets must

then asked, "

tell

The question

their legend."

What

should be the forms (types) of Theology?" upon which the answer follows that the gods must be proclaimed as they are, whether they are spoken of in is

"epics, in lyrics, or in tragedy"

(e'y eVeo-t,

iv /xeXecrLv or iv

This statement admits of no doubt. In this place at least -Xoyia is used in the sense of speaking. And with reference to its composition with ^eo-, it is evident that the idea of investigatmg the being of God must have originated much later than the necessity of speaking about rpayoiSia^.

Hence our

the gods.

first

conclusion

is

that -\o<yLa in this

combination was originally used in the sense of speaking. The second question, what 6eo- in this combination means, the gods in general or the only true God, can likewise be

answered by the above citation from Plato. Plato himself interchanges theology with a speaking of the gods in Concerning the third quesepics, in lyrics, or in tragedy. '

tion,

'

however, whether in this combination

we must grant

subject,

OeofjLTjVLa,

etc., a

god

the

In

6eo86cno<i,

Oeo/cpaTM^ OeoKpicria^ Oeoyafjbta, OeoTrpa^ia, OeoTrpoTria, is

meant who

gives,

who

is

angry,

judges, marries, acts, speaks, and thus 6eo-

On

6eo- is object or

the possibility of both.

other hand, in Beoa-e^eia,

who

rules,

is

the subject.

OeofiifirjcrLa,

0€OK\vr-t]cn<;,

it is a god who is feared, imitated, inSeoXoyca, and honored, hence Oeo- is the object. therefore, can mean etymologically the speaking of God, as well as the speaking about God. Or if you take deoXojLa in the later sense of knowledge, then it indicates a knowledge which God Himself has, as well as a knowledge which we have of God. Finally, in the last-mentioned sense OeoXoya seems to be older than deoXoyetv., and it appears The that deoXoyelv as well as OeoXoyia are derived from it. result therefore is that Theology etymologically is no combination of ^eJ? and Xo'709, but means originally a speaking of or about a god or gods and that only with the further

OeoXarpeia, etc.,

voked,

;

I

Deze tekst is geautomatiseerd gemaakt en kan nog fouten bevatten. Digibron werkt voortdurend aan correctie. Klik voor het origineel door naar de pdf. Voor opmerkingen, vragen, informatie: contact.

Op Digibron -en alle daarin opgenomen content- is het databankrecht van toepassing. Gebruiksvoorwaarden. Data protection law applies to Digibron and the content of this database. Terms of use.

Bekijk de hele uitgave van zaterdag 1 januari 1898

Abraham Kuyper Collection | 708 Pagina's

Encyclopedia of sacred theology - pagina 254

Bekijk de hele uitgave van zaterdag 1 januari 1898

Abraham Kuyper Collection | 708 Pagina's