Encyclopedia of sacred theology - pagina 241
its principles ...
Chap. V]
IN
THE ORGANISM OF SCIENCE ?
217
would not be that despot himbut "the knowledge of his person," such as he had
object of your investigation self,
purposed to hand down to posterity.
God
here.
And
this is the case
has not unintentionally left behind
Him
traces
His works and revelations of His thoughts in monuments and documents, from which we are to search out who God is. But purposely, and fully conscious of what He was doing, the Lord our God has imparted a knowledge of His Beingsuch as He desired that this knowledge should be. And He has done this in such a way that this revelation does not contain His absolute image, but conveys this knowledge in that particular form which alone can be of service to you. What we supposed in the case of the Asiatic despot to have sprung from the desire to have a different image of himself outlive him from that which he had exhibited in reality, takes place here by means of the third term of comparison (tertium comparationis). The image which is purposely exhibited here is different from the real Being, simply because it is only in that definite form, " according to the measure of man" (pro mensura hominis), that it can be taken up by us. of
We
are therefore fully authorized to say that that
which
monuments and documents is real Being of God, which we are
presents itself to us in these
not the knowledge of the
to search out from them, but, on the contrary, that in these
monuments and documents Himself, such as
we
He
investigate these
lies
an image of God, drawn by
desires us to receive.
Hence, when
monuments and documents,
which we search out
is
ectijpal knoivledge of Grod,
the object
not the Divine Being, but that
which
is
posited in
them by God
Himself, and which corresponds entirely to the character of our human nature and our human consciousness. The investigation of
those
monuments and documents, and
search after the ectypal knowledge of in, is
God
the
contained there-
a scientific task in an equally rigorous sense as, in the
supposed case, the historic expounding of the image of such a Pharaoh or Asiatic despot. We admit, of course, that in this section it is only an hypothesis that the Lord our
God
has placed such
monu-
\
Deze tekst is geautomatiseerd gemaakt en kan nog fouten bevatten. Digibron werkt
voortdurend aan correctie. Klik voor het origineel door naar de pdf. Voor opmerkingen,
vragen, informatie: contact.
Op Digibron -en alle daarin opgenomen content- is het databankrecht van toepassing.
Gebruiksvoorwaarden. Data protection law applies to Digibron and the content of this
database. Terms of use.
Bekijk de hele uitgave van zaterdag 1 januari 1898
Abraham Kuyper Collection | 708 Pagina's
Bekijk de hele uitgave van zaterdag 1 januari 1898
Abraham Kuyper Collection | 708 Pagina's